Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi
Abbreviation: JEPS | ISSN (Online): 2757-7600 | DOI: 10.29329/jeps

Derleme Makalesi    |    Open Access
Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi 2024, Vol. 5(2) 199-223

Exploring Comparative Education through Definitions, History, Methods and Theories

Bahar Yakut Özek & Sakine Sincer

pp. 199 - 223   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2024.1105.7

Publish Date: Aralık 31, 2024  |   Number of Views: 22  |  Number of Download: 23

PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims at exploring the field of comparative education, tracing its historical evolution, methodologies, and theoretical underpinnings. Beginning with an overview of early scholars who shaped the field, the study delves into varied methodological approaches such as Jullien’s experimental deductive method and Bray and Thomas’s multidimensional analysis. Theoretical perspectives, including Dependency Theory and Liberation Theory, are scrutinized for their impact on educational systems around the world. The Turkish context is interwoven in the study, highlighting its historical and contemporary relevance. This study employs the method of literature review to synthesize insights from diverse sources to present a holistic overview. This methodological approach guarantees a thorough examination of the definitional, historical, methodological, and theoretical aspects of comparative education while situating the study within the broader academic dialogue, thereby contributing to the ongoing discourse in this evolving field. Emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach, the study calls for collaborative efforts across disciplines to enrich global educational understanding. In conclusion, the study serves as a resource for scholars and practitioners, providing actionable suggestions for future research and practice. This study is expected to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on comparative education, offering insights for informed decision-making in the global educational landscape. Recommendations include fostering multidisciplinary collaborations, enhancing longitudinal studies, exploring innovative pedagogies, and addressing equity issues.

Keywords: Comparative Education, Definition, Historical Development, Method, Theory

How to Cite this Article

APA 7th edition
Ozek, B.Y., & Sincer, S. (2024). Exploring Comparative Education through Definitions, History, Methods and Theories. Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 5(2), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2024.1105.7

Harvard
Ozek, B. and Sincer, S. (2024). Exploring Comparative Education through Definitions, History, Methods and Theories. Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 5(2), pp. 199-223.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozek, Bahar Yakut and Sakine Sincer (2024). "Exploring Comparative Education through Definitions, History, Methods and Theories". Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi 5 (2):199-223. https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2024.1105.7
References
  1. Adick, C. (2018). Bereday and Hilker: origins of the ‘four steps of comparison’ model. Comparative Education, 54(1), 35-48. [Google Scholar]
  2. Afdal, H. W. (2019). The promises and limitations of international comparative research on teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 258-275. [Google Scholar]
  3. Altun, S. A. (2019). Türkiye’nin PISA sonuçları ve eğitim politikalarına etkisi. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 25(2), 123-138. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslan, A. (2015). Küreselleşme bağlamında kalkınma politikalarına sosyolojik bir bakış. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 173-189. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aynal, S. (2012). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yansımaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brathwaite, J. (2017). Neoliberal education reform and the perpetuation of inequality. Critical Sociology, 43(3), 429-448. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bray, M. (2003). Comparative Education in the Era of Globalisation: evolution, missions and roles. Policy Futures in Education, 1(2), 209-224. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (2007). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different   insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472-491. [Google Scholar]
  10. Broadfoot, P. (2000). Comparative education for the 21st century: Retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357-371. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cizreli, B. (2015). Dünya sistemleri kuramı bağlamında batının göç haritası. Sosyoloji Divanı, 6, 31-40. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cowen, R. (2009). The transfer, translation and transformation of educational processes: and their shape‐shifting?. Comparative Education, 45(3), 315-327. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crossley, M., & Tikly, L. (2004). Postcolonial perspectives and comparative and international research in education: A critical introduction. Comparative Education, 40(2), 147-156. [Google Scholar]
  14. Çetin, S. K., Korkmaz, S. P., & Öner, N. S. (2017). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim alanında 15 yılda yapılan çalışmaların farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 28-40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dale, R. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education, 41(2), 117-149. [Google Scholar]
  16. Danijela, M., & Jelena, M. (2020). Methodology of comparative research in education: role and significance. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(3), 155-162 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, L. (2009). Comparative education in an increasingly globalised world. Globalisation, policy and comparative research: Discourses of globalisation, 13-34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Demir, G. T. (2017). 1918-1938 yılları arasında yayınlanan egitim dergilerindeki karşılaştırmalı eğitim makaleleri. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 6(1), 15-25 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckstein, M. A., & Noah, H. J. (1985). Dependency Theory in Comparative Education: The New Simplicitude. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Education, 15(2), 213-25. [Google Scholar]
  20. Erdoğan, İ. (2003). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim: Türk eğitim bilimleri çalışmaları içinde   önemsenmesi gereken bir alan. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3). [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairbrother, G. P. (2005). Comparison to what end? Maximizing the potential of comparative           education research. Comparative Education, 41(1), 5-24. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gillies, D. (2015). Human capital theory in education. In Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer Science+ Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  23. Griffiths, T. (2010). Dependency Theory and World Systems Analysis in Comparative and   International Education. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Theory in Comparative and International Education, 87-104. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hill, D. (2018). Education, social slass and Marxist theory. Education and Working-Class    Youth: Reshaping the Politics of Inclusion, 181-208. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hout, W. (2016). Classical approaches to development: Modernisation and dependency. The            Palgrave handbook of international development, 21-39. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hutcheon, L. (1987). Beginning to theorize postmodernism. Textual Practice, 1(1), 10-31. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jarvis, P. (2000). Globalisation, the learning society and comparative education. Comparative Education, 36(3), 343-355. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jessop, B. (2004). Developments in Marxist theory. The Blackwell Companion to Political   Sociology, 7-16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Juvova, A., Chudy, S., Neumeister, P., Plischke, J., & Kvintova, J. (2015). Reflection of constructivist theories in current educational practice. Universal Journal of Educational         Research, 3(5), 345-349. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kubow, P. K., & Fossum, P. R. (2007). Comparative education: Exploring issues in international context. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lauwerys, J. A., Varış, F., & Neff, K. (1971). Mukayeseli eğitim. Ankara: Ayyıldız Matbaası. [Google Scholar]
  32. Masemann, V. L. (1990). Ways of knowing: Implications for comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 34(4), 465-473. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mavi, S. (2020). Bağımlılık kuramı ve Türkiye tarım politikaları. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 49-64. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mavi, D., Yaykıran, Z., & Elçelik, M. A. (2021). Karşılaştırmalı eğitime başlarken. In Karşılaştırmalı ve uluslararası eğitim (Ed. G. Arastaman). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  35. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). PISA nedir? Available at:https://pisa.meb.gov.tr/www/pisa-nedir/icerik/4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2022). Uluslararası sınavlar ve eğitim göstergeleri. Samsun Halk Eğitimi Merkezi. Available at:  https://samsunhem.meb.k12.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/55/18/970092/dosyalar/2022_08/18131223_30-KISA-KISA-MODUL-2-KISALTMALAR.pdf [Google Scholar]
  37. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2019). TIMSS 2019 Türkiye raporu açıklandı. Available at: https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/www/timss-2019-turkiye-raporu-aciklandi/icerik/613 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nafukho, F. M., Hairston, N., & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545- 551. [Google Scholar]
  39. Noah, H.J. & Eckstein, M.A. (1969). Toward A Science of Comparative Education. New York: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pettit, P. (2001). A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency. USA: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(4), 304-319. [Google Scholar]
  42. Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2006). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method and practice. London: The Cromwell Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60, 2-17. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ramsay, N. J. (2011). Emancipatory theory and method. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to            Practical Theology, 183-192. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rikowski, G., & McLaren, P. (2002). Postmodernism in educational theory. Marxism Against Postmodernism in Educational Theory, 3-13. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rozas, L. W. & Klein, W. C. (2010). The value and purpose of the traditional qualitative literature review. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(5), 387-399. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rust, V. D., Johnstone, B., & Allaf, C. (2009). Reflections on the development of comparative education. In International handbook of comparative education (pp. 121-138). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schaff, A. (2013). The Marxist theory of social development. Readings in Social Evolution and [Google Scholar]
  49. Development: The Commonwealth and International Library: Readings in Sociology. Elsevier, 71-94. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sel, V. G. (2004). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de karşılaştırmalı eğitim: Kavram, kapsam ve         eğilimler. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sezgin, Y. (2015). Türkiye'de ekonomik kalkınma ve beşeri sermaye (Master's thesis, Adnan             Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü). [Google Scholar]
  52. Şahin, F. (2021). Karşılaştırmalı eğitimin tanımı, kapsamı ve tarihçesi. In Karşılaştırmalı eğitim: Tematik bir yaklaşım (Eds. M. G. Gülcan & F. Şahin). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  53. Şahin, M. (2015). Eğitime işlevselci bir yaklaşımla Kant okuması. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 87-100. [Google Scholar]
  54. Şişman, M. (1998). Eğitim yönetiminde kuram ve araştırmada alternatif paradigma ve yaklaşımlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16(16), 395-422. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tamtik, M. (2014). Book review. Canadian and International Education, 43(2), 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  56. Tan, E. (2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 411-445. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tesar, M., Gibbons, A., Arndt, S., & Hood, N. (2021). Postmodernism in education. In Oxford         Research Encyclopedia of Education. [Google Scholar]
  58. Tikly, L. (1999). Postcolonialism and comparative education. International Review of Education, 45, 603-621. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tuijnman, A. C. (1996). Education indicators: An international perspective. Pergamon [Google Scholar]
  60. Türkoğlu, A. (1998). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim: Dünya ülkelerinden örneklerle. Adana: Baki    Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wojniak, J. (2018). George ZF Bereday (Zygmunt Fijałkowski) and his comparative method in educational research. In SHS web of conferences (Vol. 48, p. 01050). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yıldırım, C., & Türkoğlu, A. (2018). Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yansımaları: “On yıl sonra”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 31-45. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yüksel, İ. & Sağlam, M. (2012). Karşılaştırmalı eğitimde araştırma yaklaşımları, yöntemleri ve türleri, (Ed: Aynal, S.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yansımaları. (ss 35-36) (1. Baskı), Pegem      Akademi: Ankara. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 5 (2)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 5 Issue 2

Aralık 2024

All Manuscript
Copyright © 2025 Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC
All elements of this website have been created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.