Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi
Kısa Adı: JEPS | ISSN (Online): 2757-7600 | DOI: 10.29329/jeps

Derleme Makalesi    |    Açık Erişim
Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi Volume 7 (2026)

Bridging the Algorithmic and the Human: A Systematic Review of Humanistic Pedagogies for Critical AI Literacy in EFL

Kübra Şık, Rümeysa Pektaş

ss. 1 - 13   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2026.1436.6

Yayın Tarihi: May 27, 2026  |   Görüntüleme Sayısı: 0/0   |   İndirilme Sayısı: 0/0


Özet

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into the field of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education presents both significant opportunities for pedagogical innovation as well as ethical challenges concerning learner agency, authorship, and the preservation of voice. While AI-enabled tools can help learners through the provision of instant feedback, having documents translated automatically, and by providing personalised learning support, many learners lack critical AI literacy and the ability to recognise algorithmic bias; interpret probabilistic output; and to ethically engage with AI-generated content. The challenges associated with these issues need to be addressed using pedagogical approaches that are based upon humanistic educational values rather than just technical ability. This systematic literature review is the product of a thorough search of 42 empirical and conceptual studies published between 2015 and 2025 and conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines within the contexts of EFL and higher education. The review examines to what extent humanistic pedagogies have been used to develop critically aware learners for AI literacy in the field of EFL. The thematic synthesis of the studies' findings, and the literature overall, suggests three major themes: affecting/humanistic engagement; developing AI literacy through critical thinking; and agency/authorship in relation to AI-generated texts. In addition, the literature clearly shows a shift toward considering AI not merely as a corrective tool, but rather as an equal yet secondary partner in a human-in-the-loop context. Overall, the research shows that humanistic techniques such as reflective dialogue, questioning AI output, editing and disclosing information openly help learners have a sense of authorship, less anxiety when writing, as well as developing ethical judgement and evaluative judgment in relation to what they have written. It is concluded that in order for AI to be used successfully in EFL, there should be an inclusion of the use of AI into pedagogy that promotes and supports autonomy, empathy and reflection on a critical level.

Anahtar kelimeler: GenAI, Language Teaching, AI literacy, Humanistic View.


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır

APA 7th edition
Sik, K., & Pektas, R. (2026). Bridging the Algorithmic and the Human: A Systematic Review of Humanistic Pedagogies for Critical AI Literacy in EFL. Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2026.1436.6

Harvard
Sik, K. and Pektas, R. (2026). Bridging the Algorithmic and the Human: A Systematic Review of Humanistic Pedagogies for Critical AI Literacy in EFL. Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 7(1), pp. 1-13.

Chicago 16th edition
Sik, Kubra and Rumeysa Pektas (2026). "Bridging the Algorithmic and the Human: A Systematic Review of Humanistic Pedagogies for Critical AI Literacy in EFL". Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi 7 (1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2026.1436.6

Kaynakça
  1. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company. [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Joseph, S., Murphy, D., & Holford, J. (2020). Positive education: A new look at Freedom to Learn. Oxford Review of Education, 46(5), 549-562. [Google Scholar]
  5. Luckin, R., George, K., & Cukurova, M. (2022). AI for school teachers. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mohebbi, A. (2025). Enabling learner independence and self-regulation in language education using AI tools: a systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2433814. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339. [Google Scholar]
  8. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,& Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. [Google Scholar]
  9. Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Selwyn, N., Ljungqvist, M., & Sonesson, A. (2025). When the prompting stops: Exploring teachers’ work around the educational frailties of generative AI tools. Learning, Media and Technology, 50(3), 310-323. [Google Scholar]
  11. Selwyn, N., & Szili, A. (2025). The role of ‘AI advocate’ teachers in mediating technological change across Australian schools. Teachers and Teaching, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: Emergent assemblages and entangled actions. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 106-125. [Google Scholar]
  13. Underhill, A. (1989). Process in humanistic education. ELT Journal, 43(4), 250–260. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, L., & Luo, T. (2025). Guided or guiding: contradictions and conflicts in AI-Assisted second language writing for EFL learners from the activity theory perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-22. [Google Scholar]