Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi
Abbreviation: JEPS | ISSN (Online): 2757-7600 | DOI: 10.29329/jeps

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi    |    Açık Erişim
Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi 2021, Cil. 2(1) 1-30

Educating Citizens through Bildung. Didactics and Pedagogy in the service of Democracy

Asger Sørensen

ss. 1 - 30   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jeps.2021.438.1

Yayın tarihi: Nisan 19, 2022  |   Okunma Sayısı: 53  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 37


Özet

The general challenge that I am addressing, and for which I propose a remedy, is the perceived lack of interest in citizenship education. To overcome, or at least mitigate, this challenge, I propose to invigorate democratic citizenship education by employing the fruitful German idea of Bildung. After considering what may be the problem for citizenship education, namely alienation, I turn to Wolfgang Klafki’s famous Studies in Bildung Theory and Didactics and his New Studies in the same subjects. I first sketch some of the conceptual potentials in the classical idea of Bildung, emphasizing generality, versatility, politics and aesthetics. In continuation, I consider Bildung as a contemporary educational ideal, arguing thus with Klafki that pedagogy and didactics must endorse a renewed humanism, recognizing critically and constructively both the classical educational heritage, the hermeneutics implied by this appreciation, empirical studies of education, and the ideology critique of Critical Theory. As Klafki, my overall goal is to provide a comprehensive theory of learning, teaching and schooling, i.e. a general didactics. However, even in this general sense, the didactical ambition is still political, namely to sustain and develop a social democracy that stimulate further the continued strive for realizing a comprehensive idea of humanism.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Bildung, Citizenship Education, Democracy, Humanism, Didactics


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır

APA 6th edition
Sørensen, A. (2021). Educating Citizens through Bildung. Didactics and Pedagogy in the service of Democracy . Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-30. doi: 10.29329/jeps.2021.438.1

Harvard
Sørensen, A. (2021). Educating Citizens through Bildung. Didactics and Pedagogy in the service of Democracy . Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi, 2(1), pp. 1-30.

Chicago 16th edition
Sørensen, Asger (2021). "Educating Citizens through Bildung. Didactics and Pedagogy in the service of Democracy ". Eğitim Felsefesi ve Sosyolojisi Dergisi 2 (1):1-30. doi:10.29329/jeps.2021.438.1.

Kaynakça
  1. Aristotle. (1984/1995). Politics (W. D. Ross & W. A. Pickard-Cambdrige, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (vol. 2, pp. 1986-2129, 1252a-1342b). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Breit, G., & Schiele, S. (Eds.). (2002). Demokratie-Lernen als Aufgabe der politischen Bildung. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. [Google Scholar]
  3. Breslin, T., & Dufour, B. (Eds.). (2006). Developing Citizens : A Comprehensive Introduction to Effective Citizenship Education in the Secondary School. London: Hodder Murray. [Google Scholar]
  4. Camps, V. (2007). Educar para la ciudadanía. Sevilla: Fundacíon Ecoem. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerletti, A. (2015). Didáctica aleatoria de la filosofía, dialectica del aprendizaje filosófico. In A. Cerletti & A. Couló (Eds.), Didácticas de la filosofía. Entre enseñar y aprender a filosofar (pp. 15-32). Buenos Aires, Mexico: noveduc, Novedades educativas. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chrostowska, S. D. (2019). Serious, not all that serious: Utopia beyond realism and normativity in contemporary critical theory. Constellations, 26(2), 330-343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Claire, H. (Ed.) (2004). Teaching citizenship in primary schools. Exeter: Learning Matters. [Google Scholar]
  8. Durkheim, É. (1996). Jugement de valeur et jugement de fait (1911). In Sociologie et philosophie (pp. 115-141). Paris: P.U.F. [Google Scholar]
  9. Durkheim, É. (1997). Leçons de sociologie (1950). Paris: P.U.F. [Google Scholar]
  10. Enslin, P., & White, P. (2003). Democratic Citizenship. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education (Pb. ed., pp. 110-125). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferrara, A. (2015). The Democratic Horizon. Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism [2014] (Pb. ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gamper Sachse, D. (2009). Educación para la ciudadanía. Derechos, democracia y la moralidad del espacio. Claves de razón práctica(193), 36-43. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gamper Sachse, D. (2016). Laicidad europea: apuntes de filosofía política postsecular. Barcelona: Bellaterra. [Google Scholar]
  14. Geiselberger, H. (Ed.) (2017). Die große Regression : eine internationale Debatte über die geistige Situation der Zeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guisán, E. (1992). El utilitarismo. In V. Camps (Ed.), Historia de la ética. 2. La ética moderna (pp. 457-499). Barcelona: Crítica. [Google Scholar]
  16. Habermas, J. (1988). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (1981). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
  17. Habermas, J. (1997). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (1992) (4 (1994) ed.). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hegel, G. W. F. (1952). Phänomenologie  des Geistes (1807) (J. Hoffmeister Ed.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hügli, A. (1999). Philosophie und Pädagogik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, A. S. (2012). Didaktik i dagtilbud og indskoling. To modtræk til det mål bare børneliv. Cursiv(10), 31-46. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jun, N. J. (Ed.) (2017). Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy. Leiden and Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kemp, P. (1992). Das Unersetzliche. Eine Technologie-Ethik. Berlin: Wichern-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  23. Klafki, W. (1964). Das pädagogische Problem des Elementaren und die Theorie der kategorialen Bildung (1959) (3./4. ed.). Weiheim: Julius Beltz. (DPE) [Google Scholar]
  24. Klafki, W. (1972). Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik (1963) (9 ed.). Weinheim: Beltz. (SBD) [Google Scholar]
  25. Klafki, W. (1973). Das pädagigische Verhältnis (1970). In W. Klafki, H. J. Finckh, & H. Müller-Kohlenberg (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaft : eine Einführung (1970) (pp. 53-91). Frankfurt am Main; Weinheim: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag ; Beltz. [Google Scholar]
  26. Klafki, W. (2007). Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Zeitgemässe Allgemeinbildung und kritisch-konstruktive Didaktik (1985) (6 ed.). Weinheim: Beltz Verlag. (NSBD) [Google Scholar]
  27. Klafki, W. (2018a). Probleme der Erziehungswissenschaft als kritisch-konstruktiver Theorie (1976). In K.-H. Braun, F. Stübig, & H. Stübig (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Reflexion und pädagogisch-politisches Engagement. Wolfgang Klafki weiterdenken (pp. 27-30). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. [Google Scholar]
  28. Klafki, W. (2018b). An welchen Werten sollten sich pädagogische Entscheidungen orientieren? (1985). In K.-H. Braun, F. Stübig, & H. Stübig (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Reflexion und pädagogisch-politisches Engagement. Wolfgang Klafki weiterdenken (pp. 31-50). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. [Google Scholar]
  29. Korsgaard, O., Sigurdsson, L., & Skovmand, K. (Eds.). (2007). Medborgerskab - et nyt dannelsesideal? Frederiksberg: RPF. [Google Scholar]
  30. Meyer, H., & Meyer, M. A. (2017). Zur internationalen Rezeption der Veröffentlichungen Wolfgang Klafkis. In A. Köker & J. C. Störtländer (Eds.), Kritische und konstruktive Anschlüsse an das Werk Wolfgang Klafkis (pp. 180-209). Weinheim Basel: Beltz Juventa. [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyer, M. A., & Meyer, H. (2007). Wolfgang Klafki : eine Didaktik für das 21. Jahrhundert? Weinheim: Beltz. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mueller, A. (Ed.) (2019). Special Issue on Populism (Philosophy and Social Criticism 45, no. 9-10): Sage. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nordenbo, S. E. (1983). Indledning. Wolfgang Klafki - fra åndsvidenskabelig til kritisk-konstruktiv pædagogik. In W. Klafki (Ed.), Kategorial dannelse og kritisk-konstruktiv pædagogik (pp. 9-32). København: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck. [Google Scholar]
  34. Novella Suárez , J. (2007). El pensamiento reaccionario español, 1812-1975 : tradición y contrarrevolución en España. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ofstad, H. (1987). Vårt förakt för svaghet : nazismens normer och värderingar - och våra egna (1972/79) (C. Johnson, Trans. Pb. ed.). Stockholm: Prisma. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism (1993) (Pb. ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (1971) (Revised ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rieger-Ladich, M. (2019). Bildungstheorien zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. [Google Scholar]
  39. Riutort Serra, B. (Ed.) (2007). Indagaciones sobre la ciudadanía : transformaciones en la era global. Barcelona: Icaria. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rorty, R. (1994). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1980). Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schnack, K. (2003). Action Competence as an Educational Ideal In D. Trueit, W. E. Doll Jr., H. Wang, & W. F. Pinar (Eds.), The Internationalization of Curriculum Studies: selected proceedings from the LSU conference 2000 (pp. 271-291). New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schäfer, A., & Zürn, M. (2021). Die demokratische Regression: die politischen Ursachen des autoritären Populismus. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stojanov, K. (2006). Bildung und Anerkennung. Soziale Voraussetzungen von Selbst-Entwicklung und Welt-Erschließung. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stojanov, K. (2018). Education, Self-Consciousness and Social Action: Bildung as a neo-Hegelian concept. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  45. Svanøe, L. R. (2019). Schiller Revisited: Aesthetic Play as the Solution to Halbbildung and Instrumental Reason. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 53(3), 34-53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jaesteduc.53.3.0034 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sørensen, A. (1995). P. Kemp: Das Unersetzlische. Epistemologia, 10(2), 365-367. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sørensen, A. (2002). Value, Business and Globalisation – Sketching a Critical Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1-2), 161-167. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sørensen, A. (2012a). Den moralske virkelighed. Malmö: NSU Press. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sørensen, A. (2012b). Durkheim: The Goal of Education in a Democratic State is Autonomy. In P. Kemp & A. Sørensen (Eds.), Politics in Education (pp. 183-198). Paris/Berlin: Institut international de philosophie/Lit Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sørensen, A. (2014). Approaching Political Philosophy through the Critique of Liberalism. Acta Politologica, 6(3), 264-278. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sørensen, A. (2015a). From Critique of Ideology to Politics. Habermas on Bildung. Ethics and Education, 10(2), 252-270. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sørensen, A. (2015b). Not Work, but Alienation and Education. Bildung in Hegel’s Phenomenology. Hegel Studien, 49, 57-88. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sørensen, A. (2015c). Visiting the Neo-Liberal University: New Public Management and Conflicting Normative Ideas. A Danish Case. Journal of Educational Controversy, 10(1, art. 6), 1-49. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sørensen, A. (2017). Introducing Theme and Articles. In A. Sørensen (Ed.), Kant and the Establishment of Peace (pp. 7-45). Leiden & Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sørensen, A. (2019a). Alienation Reconsidered. Criticizing non-speculative anti-essentialism. Eikasia Revista de filosofía, 89 (Monográfico: Narrativas de crisis y nuevos sujetos), 151-180. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sørensen, A. (2019b). Capitalism, Alienation and Critique. Studies in Economy and Dialectics (Dialectics, Deontology and Democracy, vol. I) (L. R. Svanøe Ed.). Leiden & Boston: Brill. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sørensen, A. (2020a). Bildung as Democratic Opinion and Will Formation. Habermas Beyond Habermas. In T. Strand (Ed.), Rethinking ethical-political education (pp. 137-151). Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sørensen, A. (2020b). Expanding Democratic Citizenship Education Through Bildung. Klafki Confronting 21st Century. In C. Naval, A. Bernal, G. Jover, J. L. Fuentes, & A. R. Cárdenas (Eds.), Una acción educativa pensada : Reflexiones desde la filosofía de la Educación (IX Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de la Educación) (pp. 931-941). Madrid: Editorial Dykinson, S.L. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sørensen, A. (2020c). Pour un élargissement de l’éducation à la citoyenneté démocratique à travers la Bildung: Klafki défiant le 21ème siècle (Neli Dobrova, Trans.). Nordicum-Mediterraneum, 15(3). [Google Scholar]
  60. Sørensen, A. (2021a). Aliénation, Entfremdung – and Alienation. Hegel’s Solidary Displacement of Diderot. Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 32(4), 589-628. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sørensen, A. (2021b). Classical Critical Theory, Epistemological Dialectics and General Economy. Reply to Criticism Raised in Belgrade and Shanghai. Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 32(1), 40-64. doi:10.2298/FID2101040S [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  62. Sørensen, A. (2022 (forthcoming)-a). Alienation and Human Nature. Recuperating the Classical Discussion. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sørensen, A. (2022 (forthcoming)-b). Educar a los ciudadanos a través de bildung. Didáctica y pedagogía al servicio de la democracia. In J. Valdivielso (Ed.), Democracia en estado de alarma. Sujetos emergentes y esfera pública. Madrid: CSIC. [Google Scholar]
  64. Valdivielso Navarro, J. (2015). La disputa por la educación ciudadanista. In A. Campillo & D. Manzanero (Eds.), Los retos de la filosofía en el siglo XXI. Actas de I Congreso Internacional de la Red Española de Filosofía. Valencia: Universitat de València. [Google Scholar]
  65. Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (1985) (J. Lear Ed.). Florence, UNITED STATES: Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]